Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÛÀº Á÷°æ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁöÁö ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È¯ÀÚ ¸¸Á·µµ Á¶»ç

Patients satisfaction for implant supported overdenture with small diameter implant

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 49±Ç 1È£ p.29 ~ 37
ÀÌ»ó¿±, ÃÖ´ë±Õ, ¹éÀåÇö, ±Ç±à·Ï,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̻󿱠( Lee Sang-Yeup ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÃÖ´ë±Õ ( Choi Dae-Gyun ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹éÀåÇö ( Paek Jang-Hyun ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±Ç±à·Ï ( Kwon Kung-Rock ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: ¾ç¾Ç ÃÑÀÇÄ¡¸¦ »ç¿ë ÁßÀΠȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇϾǿ¡ 4°³ÀÇ ÀÛÀº Á÷°æÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿© implant supported overdenture·Î Àüȯ ½Ã ȯÀÚÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ (ÀúÀÛ, À¯Áö, ¹ßÀ½, ½É¹Ì, »çȸÀû ¹®Á¦, ½É¸®Àû ¹®Á¦)¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 60¼¼ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¿ÏÀü ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ȯÀÚ Áß »óÇÏ¾Ç ÃÑÀÇÄ¡¸¦ ÀåÂøÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼ú Àü¿¡ Áø´Ü ½ºÅÙÆ®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø (CT, panorama) ÃÔ¿µÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ÇöÀç »ç¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ÀÇÄ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ´ëÇØ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× ÈÄ ÇÏ¾Ç ÀÌ°ø Àü¹æºÎ¿¡ 4°³ÀÇ mini dental implant ½Ä¸³ ¹× immediate loading ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø ÃÔ¿µÀ» ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ä¸³ 1´ÞÈÄ¿Í 3´Þ ÈÄ¿¡ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¼ö¼ú Àü°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ ÅëÇÑ overdenture »ç¿ë ½Ã ¸¸Á·µµ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ÇöÀç 9¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1. ÃÑ 36°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌÁß 1°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®°¡ ½ÇÆÐÇÏ¿© 97.2%ÀÇ »ýÁ¸·üÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 2. ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ Àü, Èĸ¸Á·µµ ºñ±³´Â oral health impact profile 49¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼³¹® Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÀÌ·ç¾î Á³´Ù. ÀúÀÛ ½Ã ºÒÆí°¨, À¯Áö, ¹ßÀ½, ½É¹Ì, »çȸÀû È°µ¿½Ã ºÒÆí°¨, ½É¸®Àû ºÒÆí°¨ µîÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç 5Á¡ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ºÒÆí°¨ÀÌ ½ÉÇÒ¼ö·Ï ³·Àº Á¡¼ö¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ »ó½ÂÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× Áß À¯Áö·Â ¸é¿¡¼­ °¡Àå Å©°Ô ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ »ó½ÂÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç »çȸȰµ¿½Ã ºÒÆí°¨, ½É¸®Àû ºÒÆí°¨, ÀúÀ۽à ºÒÆí°¨, ½É¹Ì, ¹ßÀ½ ¼øÀ¸·Î °³¼±µÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: À̹ø ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© mini dental implant¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÇÄ¡¸¦ »ç¿ë½Ã ȯÀÚÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁø °ÍÀ» º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Ãß ÈÄ Á» ´õ ¸¹Àº ȯÀÚ¸¦ ÅëÇØ Àå±â°£ ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÇÒ ¿¹Á¤À̸ç Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖÀ§ °ñ ¼Ò½Ç ¿©ºÎ¸¦ °üÂûÇÒ ¿¹Á¤ÀÌ´Ù.

PURPOSE: In cases when implant supported overdenture is made by using standard size implant, additional procedure such as bone surgery and bone grafting can be required. And it gives burden to doctor and patient in terms of cost. Therefore, it is necessary to find the implant therapy for the edentulous patients in making denture with accordable cost and simple procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous patients with upper and lower dentures participated in this study. Before the operation, survey about patient¡¯s satisfaction to the existing dentures was carried out. Surgical procedures included four small diameter implants installation anterior area and immediate loading. One and three month after the procedure, the same survey about patient¡¯s satisfaction was carried out, and radiography was taken.

RESULTS: We are doing research to the nine patients. Survival rate is 97.2 percent. The comparison of patient¡¯s satisfaction before and after surgery is performed based on oral health impact profile 49. We analyze mainly with masticatory discomfort, retention, aesthetics, social problem, psychological discomfort problems. As a result, satisfaction level is increased at all factors. Retention is the most increased satisfactory factor followed by mastication difficulty, pronunciation, psychological discomfort, social discomfort, aesthetics in order. Marginal bone loss is 0.21 mm at 12 weeks after implant placement.

CONCLUSION: This research reveals that the denture supported by mini dental implant increases patient¡¯s satisfaction. This study will be continued with more patients for a long time and we are scheduled for taking additional radiography to check whether peri-implant bone resorption occurs or not.

Å°¿öµå

¿ÏÀü ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ȯÀÚ; ÇÏ¾Ç ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁöÁö ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡
Completely edentulous patients;Implant-supported mandibular ovedentures; Mini dental implant; Immediate function

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed